Skip to content
Farmstand
    • Worker JusticeAdvocating for safe conditions, fair wages, and dignity for farmers and laborers
    • Farmers & Rural CommunitiesStrengthening local food systems through fair and equitable markets
    • Climate & Environmental ProtectionWorking to stop deceptive greenwashing and enforcing environmental laws
    • Animal WelfareFighting Ag-Gag laws that stifle protests against inhumane factory farming
    • Consumer RightsDefending the right to clear labeling and transparency about food production practices
  • Court Cases
    • All Court Cases
  • Get Involved
  • News
    • In The News
    • Insights
    • Deep Dives
    • Press Releases
    • For the Media
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers at FarmSTAND
    • Shop FarmSTAND
  • Donate
  • Sign Up
  • Contact
Search
September 25, 2019

Dakota Rural Action v. USDA

Case

Farmers & Rural Communities

A coalition of groups representing family farmers, sustainable agriculture advocates and concerned citizens throughout the country filed suit against the United States Department of Agriculture. The suit aims to stop a USDA policy allowing industrial agriculture facilities to set up operations in communities without undergoing any review of their impact on local families or providing any notice of their planned operations to neighbors in the impacted areas.

The USDA’s rule change, adopted in 2016 by its Farm Service Agency, grants exemptions from the usual process of notice, comment and oversight in cases where the government is providing taxpayer-subsidized loans to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) considered “medium-sized” by the USDA. Such facilities are authorized to hold nearly 125,000 chickens, 55,000 turkeys, 2,500 pigs, 1,000 beef cattle, or 700 dairy cows. By failing to review the financing for these facilities under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Trump Administration has helped cloak their planned operations in secrecy, preventing rural communities from obtaining information regarding the impact of these operations on local air and water quality. In so doing, the Administration promotes factory farms over family farms.

The lawsuit alleges that both the rulemaking process, and the final rule now being implemented by the Trump Administration, violate NEPA and the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to provide adequate notice of the proposed rule change and refusing to clarify why medium-sized CAFOs should be provided this special treatment and automatically exempt. Between the rule’s implementation in August 2016 and December 2017, the government allowed 40 such operations in four Arkansas counties alone with no public comment or environmental assessment. During the same time frame, eight such operations in Iowa, housing nearly 20,000 pigs and generating as much untreated sewage as a town of 200,000 residents, were also allowed to escape any assessment or comment period.

Animal Legal Defense Fund, Association of Irritated Residents, Citizens Action Coalition, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, and Food & Water Watch are represented by ALDF, FarmSTAND (formerly the Food Project at Public Justice), and Food & Water Watch.

Dakota Rural Action and White River Waterkeeper are represented by FarmSTAND (formerly the Food Project at Public Justice) and Food & Water Watch.

Trial Briefs

Amended Complaint (Dakota Rural Action v. USDA)

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dakota Rural Action v. USDA)

Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dakota Rural Action v. USDA)

Exh. A to Motion for Summary Judgment — California’s Methane Super-Emitters (Dakota Rural Action v. USDA)

Plaintiffs’ Reply in support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Dakota Rural Action v. USDA)

Return to All Cases

Related Posts

The Cedar Rapids Gazette: Iowa farm grants restored by court order — for now

Climate & Environmental Protection Farmers & Rural Communities
“Howell ordered the USDA to reinstate the terminated awards for the 24 nonprofits participating in the lawsuit, including both Iowa […]
View post

Progressive Grocer: Hannaford Hit With Class Action Over Sustainability of Its Salmon

Animal Welfare Climate & Environmental Protection Consumer Rights Farmers & Rural Communities
“When retailers like Hannaford falsely tell customers that industrially farmed products from seafood conglomerates are equally sustainable to local catch […]
View post

SeafoodSource: Ahold Delhaize subsidiary Hannaford latest company to be hit with civil suit over seafood sustainability claims

Animal Welfare Climate & Environmental Protection Consumer Rights Farmers & Rural Communities
“FarmSTAND alleges Hannaford salmon supplier Cooke Aquaculture is ‘notorious for converting Maine’s seabed into fish feedlots’ and that its other […]
View post

National Headquarters
712 H Street NE Suite 2534
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 595-8816

Stay engaged with the fight for a fair food system. Sign up for emails from FarmSTAND.

Footer Newsletter


  • Our Issues
    • Worker JusticeAdvocating for safe conditions, fair wages, and dignity for farmers and laborers
    • Farmers & Rural CommunitiesStrengthening local food systems through fair and equitable markets
    • Climate & Environmental ProtectionWorking to stop deceptive greenwashing and enforcing environmental laws
    • Animal WelfareFighting Ag-Gag laws that stifle protests against inhumane factory farming
    • Consumer RightsDefending the right to clear labeling and transparency about food production practices
  • Court Cases
    • All Court Cases
  • Get Involved
  • News
    • In The News
    • Insights
    • Deep Dives
    • Press Releases
    • For the Media
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers at FarmSTAND
    • Shop FarmSTAND
  • Donate

Support the Movement

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
Donate
Shop Merch
Contact Us

© 2026 Farmstand All Rights Reserved

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Site by: Eighty2degrees & Chee Studio

English
Spanish