Skip to content
Farmstand
    • Worker JusticeAdvocating for safe conditions, fair wages, and dignity for farmers and laborers
    • Farmers & Rural CommunitiesStrengthening local food systems through fair and equitable markets
    • Climate & Environmental ProtectionWorking to stop deceptive greenwashing and enforcing environmental laws
    • Animal WelfareFighting Ag-Gag laws that stifle protests against inhumane factory farming
    • Consumer RightsDefending the right to clear labeling and transparency about food production practices
  • Court Cases
    • All Court Cases
  • Get Involved
  • News
    • In The News
    • Insights
    • Deep Dives
    • Press Releases
    • For the Media
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers at FarmSTAND
  • Donate
  • Sign Up
  • Contact
Search
April 4, 2023

District Court Strikes Down Carveout for Medium-Sized Factory Farms

Climate & Environmental ProtectionFarmers & Rural Communities

Medium-sized CAFOs are now subject to government oversight before receiving federal funding

Today in a victory for rural community, sustainable agriculture, and animal welfare groups, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the United States Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) must assess the environmental impact of medium-sized concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) before extending loans to them.

In 2016, the FSA passed a rule exempting medium-sized CAFOs, also known as factory farms, from the environmental impact review and community feedback process typically required before offering taxpayer-subsidized loans to such facilities. This carveout harmed communities living near such “medium-sized” CAFOs, which are industrial livestock facilities that can confine up to 125,000 chickens, 55,000 turkeys, 2,500 pigs, 1,000 beef cattle, or 700 dairy cows, subjecting neighboring communities to pervasive odors, noxious gasses, polluted waterways, and more.

In 2019, a coalition of groups sued USDA for failing to provide adequate public notice or evidence-based justification for the exemption. Thus, the groups argued that USDA violated the National Environmental Policy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.

Today, the district court sided with the community groups, ruling that USDA arbitrarily exempted major polluters from government oversight, and that medium-sized CAFOs must be subjected to the same oversight as large ones before receiving public funds.

In the case, USDA admitted that the agency failed to provide notice and comment before creating the exemption but asked the court to overlook the error. During the five years that the case has been pending, the agency failed to offer mechanisms for community feedback or evidence that medium-sized CAFOs lack environmental impact.

Animal Legal Defense Fund, Association of Irritated Residents, Citizens Action Coalition, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, and Food & Water Watch are represented by ALDF, Public Justice, and Food & Water Watch. Dakota Rural Action and White River Waterkeeper are represented by Public Justice and Food & Water Watch.

“Our government has a duty to protect and invest in the health and wellbeing of people, our air, our water, and climate,” said Co-Chair of Dakota Rural Action Stacy Roberts, “Instead of propping up Big Ag, our government should invest in diversifying and strengthening a food system that supports independent family farmers, contributes to local communities, and heals the land, air, and water.”

Related Posts

Bloomberg Law: Trump Administration Avoids Sanctions in Case Over Farmer Grants

Farmers & Rural Communities
“The US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled Tuesday that the Trump administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act when the […]
View post

Seafood Source: Australis’ US subsidiary sued for alleged deceptive marketing on Mama Bear salmon products, marking latest seafood greenwashing case

Animal Welfare Climate & Environmental Protection Consumer Rights
“According to the plaintiff – represented by fair food system advocacy organization FarmSTAND and law firms Pearson Warshaw and Jennings […]
View post

Community Sentinel: Court Mandates USDA Must Restore $127 Million for Illegally Canceled Grants

Climate & Environmental Protection Farmers & Rural Communities
“We made sure the court was aware that immediately losing funding and having the rug pulled out from under them […]
View post

National Headquarters
712 H Street NE Suite 2534
Washington, DC 20002
(202) 595-8816

Stay engaged with the fight for a fair food system. Sign up for emails from FarmSTAND.

Footer Newsletter


  • Our Issues
    • Worker JusticeAdvocating for safe conditions, fair wages, and dignity for farmers and laborers
    • Farmers & Rural CommunitiesStrengthening local food systems through fair and equitable markets
    • Climate & Environmental ProtectionWorking to stop deceptive greenwashing and enforcing environmental laws
    • Animal WelfareFighting Ag-Gag laws that stifle protests against inhumane factory farming
    • Consumer RightsDefending the right to clear labeling and transparency about food production practices
  • Court Cases
    • All Court Cases
  • Get Involved
  • News
    • In The News
    • Insights
    • Deep Dives
    • Press Releases
    • For the Media
  • About
    • Our Team
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers at FarmSTAND
  • Donate

Support the Movement

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
Donate
Shop Merch
Contact Us

© 2026 Farmstand All Rights Reserved

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Site by: Eighty2degrees & Chee Studio

English
Spanish