{"id":807,"date":"2024-05-20T13:30:28","date_gmt":"2024-05-20T13:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/farmstand.chee.studio\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/"},"modified":"2026-09-11T21:45:34","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T21:45:34","slug":"north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Carolina del Norte debe pagar $884.987 en honorarios de abogados por defender la ley \u2019antisolu\u201c"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A \u00faltima hora del viernes, el estado de Carolina del Norte <a href=\"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/2024.05.17-Order-on-Fees-and-Costs.pdf\">acord\u00f3 pagar a una coalici\u00f3n de inter\u00e9s p\u00fablico que anul\u00f3 con \u00e9xito la ley \u201cAg-Gag\u201d de Carolina del Norte la cantidad de $884,987 en honorarios de abogados<\/a>, como resultado de los esfuerzos del estado por defender la ley durante a\u00f1os. Los grupos demandantes demandaron con \u00e9xito para detener la ley \u201cAnti-Sunshine\u201d de Carolina del Norte, un estatuto que restring\u00eda a las organizaciones y a los periodistas realizar y dar a publicidad investigaciones encubiertas. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La ley permit\u00eda a los empleadores y propietarios demandar a los investigadores encubiertos que intentaban exponer actividades poco \u00e9ticas o ilegales en el lugar de trabajo, incluso ante fiscales, reguladores y legisladores. Aunque es similar a las leyes \u201cAg-Gag\u201d impugnadas en todo el pa\u00eds, la ley del estado se extiende m\u00e1s all\u00e1 de las instalaciones de agricultura animal y penaliza las investigaciones encubiertas en entornos como guarder\u00edas y residencias de ancianos. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Los demandantes \u2013People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, el Center for Food Safety, el Animal Legal Defense Fund, Farm Sanctuary, Food &amp; Water Watch, el Government Accountability Project, Farm Forward y la American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals\u2013 emitieron la siguiente declaraci\u00f3n conjunta:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u201c\u2010Carolina del Norte pagar\u00e1 $884,987 en honorarios de abogados como resultado de defender su ley de mordaza agropecuaria, flagrantemente inconstitucional, hasta llegar a la Corte Suprema. No ten\u00eda por qu\u00e9 ser as\u00ed. Las noticias de hoy deber\u00edan servir como una advertencia seria para otros estados que defienden o consideran aprobar una ley de mordaza agropecuaria o antitransparencia: defiendan los intereses de la gran agroindustria en detrimento de la salud, la seguridad y las libertades civiles de sus ciudadanos, y elegir\u00e1n hacerlo a expensas significativas de los contribuyentes.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND ha sido el abogado principal en este litigio.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Late Friday, the state of North Carolina agreed to pay a public interest coalition that successfully struck down North Carolina\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[25,57,58],"issue":[18],"class_list":["post-807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-releases","tag-ag-gag","tag-government","tag-north-carolina","issue-animal-welfare"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys&#039; Fees for Defending &quot;Anti-Sunshine&quot; Law - Farmstand<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"&quot;It didn&#039;t have to be this way. Today\u2019s news should serve as a serious warning to other states defending or considering passing an Ag-Gag or Anti-Sunshine Law: defend Big Ag\u2019s interests to the detriment of the health, safety, and civil liberties of your citizens, and you\u2019ll be choosing to do so at the taxpayers\u2019 significant expense.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys&#039; Fees for Defending &quot;Anti-Sunshine&quot; Law - Farmstand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&quot;It didn&#039;t have to be this way. Today\u2019s news should serve as a serious warning to other states defending or considering passing an Ag-Gag or Anti-Sunshine Law: defend Big Ag\u2019s interests to the detriment of the health, safety, and civil liberties of your citizens, and you\u2019ll be choosing to do so at the taxpayers\u2019 significant expense.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Farmstand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-20T13:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-11T21:45:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/SEO-image.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sylvia Regan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sylvia Regan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sylvia Regan\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b2f2edd5171bf2eac37095605d0e769c\"},\"headline\":\"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys&#8217; Fees for Defending &#8220;Anti-Sunshine&#8221; Law\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-20T13:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-11T21:45:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":271,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"ag-gag\",\"government\",\"north carolina\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Press Releases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/\",\"name\":\"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys' Fees for Defending \\\"Anti-Sunshine\\\" Law - Farmstand\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-05-20T13:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-11T21:45:34+00:00\",\"description\":\"\\\"It didn't have to be this way. Today\u2019s news should serve as a serious warning to other states defending or considering passing an Ag-Gag or Anti-Sunshine Law: defend Big Ag\u2019s interests to the detriment of the health, safety, and civil liberties of your citizens, and you\u2019ll be choosing to do so at the taxpayers\u2019 significant expense.\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys&#8217; Fees for Defending &#8220;Anti-Sunshine&#8221; Law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Farmstand\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Farmstand\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/farmstand-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/farmstand-logo.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":103,\"caption\":\"Farmstand\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/farmstand.bsky.social\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b2f2edd5171bf2eac37095605d0e769c\",\"name\":\"Sylvia Regan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7647674064e5e8ec949b6c728802cbccde2b94e226391531eece1f9cc6455f58?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7647674064e5e8ec949b6c728802cbccde2b94e226391531eece1f9cc6455f58?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7647674064e5e8ec949b6c728802cbccde2b94e226391531eece1f9cc6455f58?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sylvia Regan\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Carolina del Norte debe pagar $884.987 en honorarios de abogados por defender la ley anti-transparencia - Farmstand","description":"\"No ten\u00eda que ser as\u00ed. Las noticias de hoy deber\u00edan servir como una seria advertencia para otros estados que defienden o est\u00e1n considerando aprobar una ley de mordaza agr\u00edcola o de transparencia: defiendan los intereses de la agroindustria en detrimento de la salud, la seguridad y las libertades civiles de sus ciudadanos, y estar\u00e1n eligiendo hacerlo a expensas significativas de los contribuyentes.\u2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys' Fees for Defending \"Anti-Sunshine\" Law - Farmstand","og_description":"\"It didn't have to be this way. Today\u2019s news should serve as a serious warning to other states defending or considering passing an Ag-Gag or Anti-Sunshine Law: defend Big Ag\u2019s interests to the detriment of the health, safety, and civil liberties of your citizens, and you\u2019ll be choosing to do so at the taxpayers\u2019 significant expense.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/","og_site_name":"Farmstand","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/","article_published_time":"2024-05-20T13:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-11T21:45:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/SEO-image.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Sylvia Regan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sylvia Regan","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Sylvia Regan","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b2f2edd5171bf2eac37095605d0e769c"},"headline":"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys&#8217; Fees for Defending &#8220;Anti-Sunshine&#8221; Law","datePublished":"2024-05-20T13:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-11T21:45:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/"},"wordCount":271,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization"},"keywords":["ag-gag","government","north carolina"],"articleSection":["Press Releases"],"inLanguage":"es-ES"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/","name":"Carolina del Norte debe pagar $884.987 en honorarios de abogados por defender la ley anti-transparencia - Farmstand","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-05-20T13:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-11T21:45:34+00:00","description":"\"No ten\u00eda que ser as\u00ed. Las noticias de hoy deber\u00edan servir como una seria advertencia para otros estados que defienden o est\u00e1n considerando aprobar una ley de mordaza agr\u00edcola o de transparencia: defiendan los intereses de la agroindustria en detrimento de la salud, la seguridad y las libertades civiles de sus ciudadanos, y estar\u00e1n eligiendo hacerlo a expensas significativas de los contribuyentes.\u2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-ES","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/north-carolina-must-pay-884987-in-attorneys-fees-for-defending-anti-sunshine-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"North Carolina Must Pay $884,987 in Attorneys&#8217; Fees for Defending &#8220;Anti-Sunshine&#8221; Law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/","name":"Puesto de granja","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es-ES"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization","name":"Puesto de granja","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-ES","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/farmstand-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/farmstand-logo.svg","width":150,"height":103,"caption":"Farmstand"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/farmstand.bsky.social"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/person\/b2f2edd5171bf2eac37095605d0e769c","name":"Sylvia Regan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-ES","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7647674064e5e8ec949b6c728802cbccde2b94e226391531eece1f9cc6455f58?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7647674064e5e8ec949b6c728802cbccde2b94e226391531eece1f9cc6455f58?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7647674064e5e8ec949b6c728802cbccde2b94e226391531eece1f9cc6455f58?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sylvia Regan"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=807"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/807\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2210,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/807\/revisions\/2210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=807"},{"taxonomy":"issue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue?post=807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}