{"id":1746,"date":"2025-09-15T08:56:11","date_gmt":"2025-09-15T08:56:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/farmstand.chee.studio\/case\/deep-dive-checkoff\/"},"modified":"2026-09-17T15:28:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T15:28:00","slug":"deep-dive-checkoff","status":"publish","type":"deep_dive","link":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/","title":{"rendered":"Deep Dive: Checkoff"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-1\">Farmers and ranchers have beef with the checkoff.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At FarmSTAND, we\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a better food system led by independent food producers \u2014 including by taking on USDA\u2019s unfair checkoff programs. Many Americans may have never heard the word \u201ccheckoff\u201d before, but these shadowy government programs are a major problem for farmers and ranchers. They stack the odds even more in favor of Big Ag by taxing farmers and then using the money collected to promote a corporate-controlled version of agriculture.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"514\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive1-1536x771-1-1024x514.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2269\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive1-1536x771-1-1024x514.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive1-1536x771-1-767x385.jpg 767w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive1-1536x771-1-300x150.jpg 300w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive1-1536x771-1.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Independent farmers are struggling. Every year, it gets harder and harder for small and mid-sized farmers to compete with the handful of enormous, consolidated corporations that dominate our current food system. If we want a fair food system, one that nourishes communities and protects our air, water, and land, we need to fight for a fair playing field so that independent farmers can survive and thrive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Basically, checkoff programs are a mandatory tax on agricultural producers.<\/strong>&nbsp;That tax money is supposed to be spent to promote overall sales of a given agricultural product like beef, pork, or dairy. While you might not be familiar with the word checkoff, the promotions they pay for are probably a part of your everyday life. If you\u2019ve ever seen a commercial for \u201cBeef. It\u2019s what\u2019s for dinner,\u201d \u201cThe Incredible, Edible Egg,\u201d or \u201cPork. The other white meat,\u201d you\u2019ve seen a checkoff ad. Those \u201cGot Milk?\u201d posters of your favorite celebrities with a milk mustache? Paid for by the milk checkoff.&nbsp; Those viral Grimace milkshake TikToks? The dairy checkoff has been&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/grist.org\/food\/butter-board-viral-dairy-lobby\/?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=daily\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">using dairy farmers\u2019 money for years to boost McDonald\u2019s sales<\/a>&nbsp;of dairy products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Proponents of checkoffs will say that the programs support all farmers, but FarmSTAND and our allies know the painful reality: Checkoffs mostly funnel money to the lobbying and trade organizations that primarily boost the largest corporate producers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Proponents of checkoffs will say that the programs support all farmers, but FarmSTAND and our allies know the painful reality: Checkoffs mostly funnel money to the lobbying and trade organizations that primarily boost the largest corporate producers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"344\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive-grimace_sm.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2279\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive-grimace_sm.jpg 344w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deepdive-grimace_sm-172x300.jpg 172w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 344px) 100vw, 344px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Proponents of checkoffs will say that the programs support all farmers, but FarmSTAND and our allies know the painful reality:&nbsp;Checkoffs mostly funnel money to the lobbying and trade organizations that primarily boost the largest corporate producers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Checkoffs put independent farmers and ranchers at a double disadvantage. Not only are checkoffs another tax to pay when operating on razor-thin margins, but the money ends up supporting the Big Ag companies that threaten to put independent farmers and ranchers out of business \u2014 and damage our health and environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND and our allies are fighting to reform the checkoff system. We\u2019re proud to have represented independent cattle ranchers in court to root out corruption in the beef checkoff.&nbsp; We\u2019ve already had some&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/beef-checkoff-case-r-calf-usa-v-perdue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">big wins<\/a>&nbsp;together, forcing USDA to take responsibility over state-level checkoff organizations that were spending ranchers\u2019 money on ads that hurt independent ranchers. We took USDA back to court to make sure that USDA actually listens to the voices of independent ranchers when it makes decisions about the checkoff, instead of making secretive deals to continue business as usual.&nbsp;In the course of our litigation, we commissioned&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/hpmyb9lpz0gvpk1oluzks\/Dimofte-Expert-Report.pdf?rlkey=o4w1eu7t7goy16lse677q8nri&amp;st=u8zf9rb5&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">groundbreaking research<\/a>&nbsp;that shows it\u2019s possible to have a checkoff that\u2019s fair for all farmers&nbsp;\u2014 simple changes to the way beef is advertised would level the playing field for independent producers selling specialized products.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s not fair that independent producers are forced to pay millions of dollars to programs that make it harder for them to survive. At FarmSTAND, we\u2019ve joined arms with ranchers and allies across the food system to put pressure on USDA to do right by producers because we believe checkoff reform is a critical step towards building a food system that benefits everyone, not just the biggest corporations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the course of our litigation, we commissioned&nbsp;groundbreaking research&nbsp;that shows it\u2019s possible to have a checkoff that\u2019s fair for all farmers&nbsp;\u2014 simple changes to the way beef is advertised would level the playing field for independent producers selling specialized products.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We envision a future where the people who make our food can make an honest living and support sustainable, healthy communities. A fair food system is transparent and accountable to real people, not corporate profits. Checkoff programs should support these values instead of secretly funneling farmers\u2019 tax money to the mega-corporations who dominate our current system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion farmstand-accordion keep-open\" data-expand-first=\"collapse\"><div>\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"how-do-checkoffs-work-\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">How Do Checkoffs Work?<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Checkoffs are mandatory tax programs that collect money from producers of an agricultural commodity \u2014 like beef, eggs, or soybeans \u2014 and pool that money to be used to advertise and conduct research that is used for advertising that commodity. For instance, every time beef cattle are sold, the seller pays one dollar per head to the checkoff.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"is-style-default wp-block-paragraph\">Checkoffs are government created programs that are the responsibility of USDA, but the actual work of spending the money and promoting the product is contracted out to private organizations \u2014 usually ones with deep loyalties to huge food companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Checkoff fees used to be voluntary. That\u2019s where the word checkoff comes from: Producers would check a box on a form saying they wanted to contribute to this program. Now, checkoffs are mandatory. Less a checkoff than a tax, producers are forced to pay for a program that many of them object to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Where does all that money go? Today, checkoff programs are little more than a funnel for billions of dollars to flow from hardworking farmers and ranchers into the pockets of agricultural trade and lobbying organizations.&nbsp;These organizations claim to represent the average American farmer, when in fact they are controlled by and lobby forcefully on behalf of powerful business interests \u2014 often for policies that hurt smaller farmers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There are currently twenty-two national checkoff programs in the United States. USDA\u2019s Agricultural Marketing Service is responsible for overseeing all the checkoffs, or more accurately, it&nbsp;<em>should<\/em>&nbsp;be responsible for these programs. In reality, the checkoffs operate with minimal oversight or accountability. USDA practically gives the organizations running checkoff programs blank checks to spend hundreds of millions of checkoff dollars a year. For decades, advocates for a fair food system have compiled evidence of mismanagement and raised alarms.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"422\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cows-in-funnel-1081x1536-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cows-in-funnel-1081x1536-1.png 422w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cows-in-funnel-1081x1536-1-211x300.png 211w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 422px) 100vw, 422px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The groups that get the lion\u2019s share of the money are powerful agricultural trade and lobbying organizations, like the National Cattlemen\u2019s Beef Association or the National Pork Producers Council. In addition to implementing checkoff promotion, these groups&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/390zyazaqosqx4p2u1ska\/NCBA-Political-and-Lobbying-Activities-and-Materials.pdf?rlkey=ws5uigeepz2230d4errhw1qut&amp;st=ypsee6to&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lobby forcefully<\/a>&nbsp;for policies that hurt independent producers and benefit big agribusiness. While these groups are prohibited from using checkoff money for lobbying, lax oversight and the fungibility of money means their lobbying practices are propped up by checkoff dollars. At FarmSTAND, we\u2019re working with ranchers and farmers to reform the checkoff system so that Big Business lobbyists can no longer use checkoffs as their slush funds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These organizations claim to represent the average American farmer, when in fact they are controlled by and lobby forcefully on behalf of powerful business interests \u2014 often for policies that hurt smaller farmers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"farmstand-and-independent-ranchers-root-out-beef-checkoff-corruption\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">FarmSTAND and Independent Ranchers Root Out Beef Checkoff Corruption<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-global-padding is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-e200ef48 wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-global-padding is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-56372a2a wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>At FarmSTAND, we\u2019re fighting for a food system that uplifts all of us, not one that funnels money away from the people making our food to a few powerful corporations. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For years, we\u2019ve joined forces with the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.r-calfusa.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund (R-CALF)<\/a>&nbsp;to root out corruption in the beef checkoff program. R-CALF is the largest producer-only membership-based organization that represents U.S. cattle and sheep producers. The independent ranchers who make up their membership are sick of seeing their money go to industry trade groups that use checkoff funds like slush-funds for their biggest, most powerful corporate contributors. Using our legal expertise, we\u2019ve brought their fight to the courtroom \u2014 and won. Together, our cases have forced USDA to take more accountability for checkoff ads that disadvantage independent producers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-global-padding is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-56372a2a wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-2\">The checkoff funnels money from producers to lobbying groups that push Big Ag\u2019s agenda.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The way that checkoff money is collected, allocated, and spent is convoluted to say the least. Because the system is so complicated and opaque, it helps to hide how much money it takes from producers, where that money ends up, and who controls the flow of cash. Peeling back the layers reveals that this system channels huge sums of money from the hands of the many beef producers into the pockets of a few.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"819\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/flow-chart-1024x819.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2284\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/flow-chart-1024x819.png 1024w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/flow-chart-300x240.png 300w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/flow-chart-767x613.png 767w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/flow-chart.png 1396w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every time a head of cattle is sold, the seller must pay a one-dollar tax to the checkoff. Almost always, an organization called a&nbsp;<strong>Qualified State Beef Council (QSBC)&nbsp;<\/strong>collects that fee \u2014 for example, the Texas Beef Council collects checkoff money for sales made in Texas. The QSBCs can keep up to fifty cents of that dollar to use themselves \u2014 more on that later \u2014 but they must send at least fifty cents from each dollar up to the&nbsp;<strong>Cattlemen\u2019s Beef Board (Beef Board)<\/strong>. The Beef Board is the organization that oversees and manages the national checkoff program. It\u2019s made up of 101 members who represent different cattle-producing regions and are appointed by the USDA secretary.&nbsp;In 2023, $42 million flowed from the beef checkoff to the Beef Board.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s made up of 101 members who represent different cattle-producing regions and are appointed by the USDA secretary.&nbsp;In 2023, $42 million flowed from the beef checkoff to the Beef Board.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Beef Board oversees something called the&nbsp;<strong>Beef Promotion Operating Committee (BPOC)<\/strong>. The committee has twenty members. Ten members are elected from the Beef Board; the other ten members are elected from something called the&nbsp;<strong>Federation of State Beef Councils, a division of the National Cattlemen\u2019s Beef Association (NCBA)<\/strong>. These twenty people decide how and where to spend the checkoff money by making contracts with organizations for marketing campaigns, research to further promote beef, and more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every year, an overwhelming majority of beef checkoff money is sent to one organization: the NCBA&nbsp;(yes, the same NCBA that comprises half of the committee that decides the contracts). In 2023, NCBA was awarded $26 million dollars in contracts with the BPOC. That\u2019s more than half of the money the Beef Board was responsible for spending, sent straight to the powerful NCBA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every year, an overwhelming majority of beef checkoff money is sent to one organization: the NCBA&nbsp;(yes, the same NCBA that comprises half of the committee that decides the contracts).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Other powerful industry groups also win contracts with the BPOC, including the American Farm Bureau Foundation ($1 million in 2023), the North American Meat Institute ($1 million), and the U.S. Meat Export Federation ($1 million).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And what about the other 50 cents that QSBCs collect? The QSBC can keep the other 50 cents to use for their own checkoff activities like advertising and research specific to their state, or they can send some portion of that money to the Federation division of NCBA. Why would state QSBCs send more money back to the Federation instead of keeping it to spend in their own state? In part, because by sending money to the Federation they can&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/d88st7xg55i7b4sku2nlx\/NCBA-Pay-to-Play-Investment-Schedule.pdf?rlkey=d9c2rz92segykf9p4a70vd31j&amp;st=vho50uuc&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">guarantee representation<\/a>&nbsp;for their state on the Federation Board of Directors, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-7\/subtitle-B\/chapter-XI\/part-1260\/subpart-A\/subject-group-ECFRd816c9f00e775ec\/section-1260.161\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">thus on the BPOC<\/a>.&nbsp;In other words, QSBCs can buy seats on the board to gain political influence over how checkoff money from around the country is spent. In 2023, QSBCs sent back $8.5 million to the Federation.&nbsp;That means NCBA ended up with a grand total of $34.5 million dollars of checkoff money that year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In other words, QSBCs can buy seats on the board to gain political influence over how checkoff money from around the country is spent. In 2023, QSBCs sent back $8.5 million to the Federation.\u00a0That means NCBA ended up with a grand total of $34.5 million dollars of checkoff money that year.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sound confusing? It is! And not by coincidence. All the boards, the acronyms, and the many steps of money changing hands make it hard for producers, consumers, and lawmakers to understand what\u2019s really happening with the checkoff. It\u2019s a complicated system with a simple result: NCBA is hoarding producers\u2019 money to benefit the biggest meatpackers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What\u2019s the big problem with NCBA getting so much checkoff money? The Federation and NCBA are limited by law to using checkoff funds only for approved uses like research and promotion, but the rest of NCBA is heavily involved in lobbying for agriculture policies that the biggest meat companies want and that threaten to put independent beef producers out of business,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmactionfund.us\/2023\/10\/18\/exposing-the-truth-about-ncba-a-public-service-announcement\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">such as lobbying against mandatory Country of Origin Labeling<\/a>. NCBA likes to pretend it speaks for every rancher in America. It especially likes to capitalize on the iconic image of the American cowboy to boost sales. But when you look past the slick PR to how it spends time and money, NCBA puts the interests of massive meatpackers ahead of ranchers fighting to make a living time and time again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Money from the checkoff (which really is tax money from ranchers) makes up almost all of NCBA\u2019s funding.<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While checkoff money cannot not be spent directly on lobbying, all that checkoff funding ends up supporting the lobbying anyway.&nbsp;Money from the checkoff (which really is tax money from ranchers) makes up almost all of NCBA\u2019s funding. A 2014 report from the Office of the USDA Inspector General found that 82.3% of NCBA\u2019s total budget comes from the checkoff.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the current scheme, NCBA is allowed to spend checkoff money on things like overhead expenses and market rates for staff time. This guarantees income and frees up other resources for NCBA to use for lobbying. It\u2019s like if every month a relative gave you a hundred dollars and told you&nbsp;<em>not<\/em>&nbsp;to spend it going to the movies. If every month you spent that hundred dollars on groceries \u2014 an acceptable use according to your benefactor, and a necessity you have no choice but to spend on \u2014 you\u2019d still find yourself with a free hundred dollars to take to the theater. In the same way,&nbsp;<strong>checkoff money offsets NCBA\u2019s key costs and effectively subsidizes their pro-big business lobbying.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-global-padding is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-56372a2a wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-3\">FarmSTAND and independent ranchers take the checkoff to court to demand accountability.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With any checkoff money they don\u2019t send to NCBA, state beef councils pay for their own promotion programs.&nbsp;For decades, QSBCs spent their millions of dollars of checkoff money with practically no oversight from the government. Many QSBCs used their money to work with huge multinational corporations to promote big business interests over those of independent ranchers. Independent ranchers had enough and sued to rein in the checkoff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For decades, QSBCs spent their millions of dollars of checkoff money with practically no oversight from the government.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For example, the Montana Beef Council used checkoff money to pay for Wendy\u2019s commercials. The state beef council was spending Montana ranchers\u2019 tax money to subsidize the fast-food company\u2019s ads even though Wendy\u2019s does not commit to buying beef from Montana ranchers, or even from American ranchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Montana ranchers are forced to pay into the checkoff program that claims to help them market their beef. But instead of helping them, their contributions were used to boost sales for a huge company that uses beef from anywhere in North America. This is an egregious example of how QSBCs controlled by powerful industry players benefit big companies while small ranchers foot the bill. At FarmSTAND, we think that\u2019s wrong. The government, which created this program, owes it to ranchers to keep the checkoff in check.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/checkoff-wendys-beef-ad-300x297.png\" alt=\"An ad that says &quot;May is beef month! Let's Celebrate!&quot; showing a cheeseburger with the message &quot;On Wednesday, May 17, get a Small Dave's Single Combo for only $5.99. Brought to you by Wendy's and Montana Beef Producers with Beef Checkoff dollars.&quot; There is a Montana Beef Council Logo and a Wendy's Logo. \" style=\"aspect-ratio:1.0101010101010102\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The checkoff program unconstitutionally subsidized private speech, violating the First Amendment.<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2016, independent ranchers were ready to take on the QSBCs. We represented R-CALF, the country\u2019s largest association of small and mid-sized cattle producers, in a lawsuit against USDA for failing to keep QSBCs in check. We argued that because the government had no control over these state council ads,&nbsp;the checkoff program unconstitutionally subsidized private speech, violating the First Amendment.&nbsp; Our argument prevailed in court: A federal judge ruled that these ads were likely unconstitutional and that USDA had failed to control the state QSBCs\u2019 use of checkoff funds.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After losing in court, USDA quickly made agreements with QSBCs to establish more oversight. Under these new arrangements, USDA must approve ads before the QSBCs run them.&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/beef-checkoff-case-r-calf-usa-v-perdue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Thanks to our case<\/a>, there finally is some accountability in how these state beef councils spend millions of dollars of beef producers\u2019 hard-earned money each year.&nbsp;<\/strong>That said, the courts left open a huge loophole: QSBCs can still transfer their money to third parties who can spend it without USDA oversight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-style-orange-citation is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMy outcome, I would like to see the money spent for us to have a voice as a producer.\u201d<\/p>\n<cite>Deposition of&nbsp;Dennis Sweat, rancher and R-CALF member<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unfortunately, USDA and the QSBCs entered these agreements illegally, since they didn\u2019t allow for public comment and participation as required by the Administrative Procedures Act. So, R-CALF and FarmSTAND <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/beef-checkoff-case-r-calf-usa-v-perdue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">brought a second lawsuit<\/a> challenging these agreements to make sure that independent producers and other stakeholders have a chance to make their voices heard.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"industry-pays-big-for-the-checkoff--research--it-wants\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Industry Pays Big for the Checkoff \u201cResearch\u201d it Wants<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Facing questions and criticism about how they spend producers\u2019 money, the beef checkoff is desperate to keep the wool over the public\u2019s eyes. Rather than fix the problems in the system, the checkoff spends a lot more money to produce \u201cresearch\u201d to prove the program works. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But our investigation revealed that the many glowing claims about the program\u2019s benefits are the result of paying millions to an industry-favorite expert whose career has largely consisted of telling the checkoff what it wants to hear. Built into the checkoff program is a system designed to justify its utility, protect its existence, and mislead the public \u2014 all while independent ranchers pay the price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND sued the beef checkoff because the checkoff\u2019s generic advertising puts independent ranchers at a disadvantage. Throughout the course of our lawsuit, we used expert research, depositions (legal proceedings where we question the other side\u2019s witnesses under oath), and other litigation tools to prove it. We found that checkoff advertising as it currently stands hurts small beef producers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30)\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-orange\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Dimofte-Expert-Report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Dimofte expert report<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-button is-style-bright-green\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the Kaiser deposition transcript<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The checkoff, of course, says the opposite and offers its own \u201cexpert\u201d research. But our litigation uncovered that their so-called expert is sloppy and lazy in his methodology, purposefully and accidentally interpreting data in a way that erases the experience of independent cattle producers, allowing him to draw conclusions that benefit big corporations over small farmers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The beef checkoff&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/investigatemidwest.org\/2021\/12\/07\/independent-cattle-ranchers-continue-fight-against-national-checkoff-program\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">claims that its advertising benefits all the beef producers<\/a>&nbsp;who are forced to pay the tax. When ranchers question how this can be when so many are struggling to stay in business, the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.beefboard.org\/2024\/11\/06\/national-beef-checkoff-roi-study-proves-value-provides-benchmark-for-programs\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">checkoff points to studies it says prove its ads are working for producers<\/a>. Many of these studies come from one man: Dr. Harry Kaiser. Kaiser is an economist whose decades-long career has been spent publishing favorable studies about the beef checkoff and other checkoffs. He\u2019s their go-to guy when they need to convince farmers, Congress, and the public that checkoff tax dollars are well spent. But our litigation revealed that Kaiser\u2019s research doesn\u2019t hold up under scrutiny, and especially doesn\u2019t back up the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=UanAgWhzoPw&amp;t\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">checkoff\u2019s claims<\/a>&nbsp;that the program benefits independent producers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The beef checkoff&nbsp;claims that its advertising benefits all the beef producers&nbsp;who are forced to pay the tax. When ranchers question how this can be when so many are struggling to stay in business, the&nbsp;checkoff points to studies it says prove its ads are working for producers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Quite a lot of checkoff tax dollars have been&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/2023\/09\/25\/meet-the-beef-checkoffs-million-dollar-man\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">spent on Kaiser<\/a>&nbsp;himself. When we deposed him, he admitted that&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/ze304wqlnqi747ajm51js\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf?rlkey=okkb11fooz536cdypib1ati1n&amp;st=31knshio&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">he has personally been paid at least a million dollars by checkoffs<\/a>&nbsp;for his research. That\u2019s on top of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/ze304wqlnqi747ajm51js\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf?rlkey=okkb11fooz536cdypib1ati1n&amp;st=31knshio&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">several million dollars&nbsp;<\/a>of checkoff money he\u2019s taken as funding for his research projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The beef checkoff&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.beefboard.org\/2024\/07\/09\/new-independent-study-finds-each-national-beef-checkoff-dollar-returns-13-41\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">loves to tout Kaiser\u2019s research to show a positive return on investment<\/a>&nbsp;for dollars spent. The beef checkoff says independent producers should feel good paying checkoff taxes because, according to Kaiser, every dollar they pay will come back to them many times over. Kaiser\u2019s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.beefboard.org\/return-on-investment\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 report<\/a>&nbsp;for the checkoff concluded that for each dollar paid, producers and importers received $13.41 back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Quite a lot of checkoff tax dollars have been&nbsp;spent on Kaiser&nbsp;himself. When we deposed him, he admitted that&nbsp;he has personally been paid at least a million dollars by checkoffs&nbsp;for his research.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By trumpeting this $13 return figure, Kaiser and the checkoff attempt to pull a fast one on concerned ranchers. They pretend that Kaiser\u2019s studies answer the question \u201chow does the checkoff benefit independent producers?\u201d when really this number only shows an impact on total beef sales and reflects the boost the checkoff gives the world\u2019s largest beef producers and packers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kaiser\u2019s studies look only at beef sales in general, measuring how checkoff-funded advertising increases overall demand. But Kaiser\u2019s research is skewed from the get-go. The checkoff\u2019s expert admitted his analysis is very broad and doesn\u2019t account for the experiences of small and mid-sized producers. This intentional vagueness obscures the reality that independent ranchers know all too well: They don\u2019t see the same benefit from the checkoff that massive meat corporations do. When we deposed him, he admitted that his studies and the research he relies on \u201care all 10,000 feet, very aggregate, macro kind of views of the way generic advertising works.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-style-orange-citation is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30)\">\n<p class=\"has-h-4-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Q: So you\u2019ve never assessed whether R-CALF\u2019s members who are just domestic producers could have potentially received a higher baseline price than other beef; is that right?<br>A: That\u2019s correct.<br>Q: And none of the articles do that, right?<br>A: That is correct. They\u2019re all 10,000 feet, very aggregate, macro kind of views of the way generic advertising works.<\/p>\n<cite>Deposition of Dr. Harry Kaiser, expert witness for USDA<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kaiser\u2019s research may show that the \u201cpie\u201d of the beef market is getting bigger, but it doesn\u2019t show whether the slice belonging to independent ranchers is growing \u2014 or shrinking. The whole pie could be getting bigger, while the slice for independent producers is getting thinner and thinner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-style-orange-citation is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--30)\">\n<p class=\"has-h-4-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Q: You say the point of generic advertising is to increase the total consumption of beef, not individual market shares. Is that right?<br>A: That is correct.<br>\u2026<br>Q: So, but generic advertising\u2019s goal is not to increase the slices evenly: it\u2019s to increase the total box. Is that right?<br>A: That is correct.<br>Q: And so that may mean that it increases the pie without increasing specific slices in proportion to what the total pie is; is that right?<br>A: That is correct<\/p>\n<cite>Deposition of Dr. Harry Kaiser, expert witness for USDA<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is no accident. By keeping the analysis broad and avoiding the hard questions, the checkoff avoids revealing the truth: Independent producers are being left behind. These reports tell us that someone is making a lot of money from checkoff spending, but they don\u2019t tell us who. By only showing us these generalized conclusions, the checkoff hides the dirty details of how checkoff advertising, paid for by everyone including independent producers, pays off only for the corporate giants who control the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The checkoff\u2019s preferred expert never asks questions like \u201cwho benefits most from the checkoff?\u201d or \u201ccould changes to the checkoff redistribute the benefits more fairly?\u201d That\u2019s where FarmSTAND and the independent producers we represent come in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our work has uncovered how the checkoff system is gaming the process, using taxpayer dollars to promote a narrative that protects the interests of the largest players while obscuring the harm done to small ranchers. It\u2019s a vicious cycle for independent producers.&nbsp;They\u2019re forced to pay the checkoff, their money is used to boost big meat at their expense AND to fund shoddy research, and that research is used to justify forcing them to continue paying the checkoff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">They\u2019re forced to pay the checkoff, their money is used to boost big meat at their expense AND to fund shoddy research, and that research is used to justify forcing them to continue paying the checkoff.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Independent ranchers who are struggling to make a living know the truth: Checkoff advertising in its current form benefits the corporations that dominate the system and leaves the little guys in the dust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-4\">Beef checkoff ads hurt independent producers, but there\u2019s a simple fix<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The checkoff is so out of touch with real ranchers and consumers that \u00ad\u2014 according to its well-funded campaigns \u2014 all \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/UanAgWhzoPw?si=C8Sc0SIKfBKQYtqO&amp;t=68\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">beef is beef.<\/a>\u201d All the independent ranchers and producers we know would disagree. When it comes to beef, the place the animals are raised, the food they eat, and so many other factors mean that not all beef is the same. Consumers at the grocery store know this too and many want to buy the best beef they can.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-f5359857 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--15);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--15)\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"529\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deep-dive-checkoff-beef-is-beef-1024x529-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2486\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deep-dive-checkoff-beef-is-beef-1024x529-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deep-dive-checkoff-beef-is-beef-1024x529-1-300x155.png 300w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/deep-dive-checkoff-beef-is-beef-1024x529-1-767x396.png 767w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Independent producers who go the extra mile to make sure their product has superior qualities want consumers to know that their beef is different and worth paying a little more for. The checkoff\u2019s \u201cbeef is beef\u201d approach erases all those special qualities, diminishing the potential advantages of selling this kind of beef and leaving independent producers competing with a mass-produced, cheap product.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unfortunately, checkoff ads like the famous \u201cBeef. It\u2019s what\u2019s for dinner.\u201d commercials advertise beef as a generic product, meaning that they sell beef as a commodity \u2014 a product that is the same no matter where it comes from.&nbsp;In other words, generic checkoff advertising flattens all beef into the same category, to the detriment of anyone trying to sell a product that is different or special.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In other words, generic checkoff advertising flattens all beef into the same category, to the detriment of anyone trying to sell a product that is different or special.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Publicly, proponents of the beef checkoff and these generic ads argue that this type of advertising benefits&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;<\/em>beef producers because it raises demand for beef generally. But really, the powerful meatpacking companies backing the checkoff know that these ads boost their sales while leaving smaller competitors behind.&nbsp;After all, if people just want beef \u2014 any beef \u2014 why wouldn\u2019t they choose the cheapest steak on the shelf instead of a more expensive but higher-quality product?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After all, if people just want beef \u2014 any beef \u2014 why wouldn\u2019t they choose the cheapest steak on the shelf instead of a more expensive but higher-quality product?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As part of our litigation against the checkoff, FarmSTAND commissioned a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/hpmyb9lpz0gvpk1oluzks\/Dimofte-Expert-Report.pdf?rlkey=o4w1eu7t7goy16lse677q8nri&amp;st=jou84408&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">first-of-its-kind study<\/a>&nbsp;to reveal the true impact of generic checkoff advertising on consumer choices when buying beef. This new research confirms what small and mid-size American ranchers have been saying for decades: The way the checkoff uses their taxes for generic advertisement hurts them by homogenizing their unique and superior products into the flat category of just beef.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"422\" height=\"251\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cow-docotr-patient-700x416-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2487\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cow-docotr-patient-700x416-1.png 422w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cow-docotr-patient-700x416-1-300x178.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 422px) 100vw, 422px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our study confirmed that current beef checkoff advertising does not differentiate American beef from other types of beef in the mind of consumers.&nbsp;Generic beef ads prime people to think of all beef as the same, which makes them less likely to pay more for beef with attributes they might prefer if they were thinking about it \u2014 like American, grass-fed, or organic beef. That means producers who make high-quality, domestic beef pay into the checkoff, but then they do not benefit fairly from the ads.&nbsp;At FarmSTAND, we took on this litigation because we think that ranchers and farmers who use regenerative grazing or ensure higher standards of animal welfare should be able to command higher prices for their products&nbsp;and&nbsp;shouldn\u2019t&nbsp;be forced to subsidize ads that suggest their higher standards&nbsp;don\u2019t&nbsp;matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Generic beef ads prime people to think of all beef as the same, which makes them less likely to pay more for beef with attributes they might prefer if they were thinking about it \u2014 like American, grass-fed, or organic beef. That means producers who make high-quality, domestic beef pay into the checkoff, but then they do not benefit fairly from the ads.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the same time generic checkoff advertising makes things harder for small producers, it also rewards Big Ag for its damaging practices. Because generic advertising keeps beef prices low, it further incentivizes concentrated, industrial meat companies to source the cheapest possible beef to maximize their profits. This cheap beef can come at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2023\/jun\/02\/more-than-800m-amazon-trees-felled-in-six-years-to-meet-beef-demand\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">huge costs to the environment<\/a>, climate, and animal welfare \u2014 yet the checkoff encourages it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-style-orange-citation is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe checkoff does one thing, and one thing only, it advertises, and promotes generic beef. We are forced by law to pay into the program by law. We are forced to pay into it to promote generic beef.\u201d<\/p>\n<cite>Deposition of&nbsp;David Wright, fourth-generation rancher, R-CALF member, and former Beef Promotion and Research Board member<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It doesn\u2019t have to be this way. Our study found that when ads provide even simple information that differentiates beef, it helps people make a more informed choice. People want to buy food that is better for their families, for animals, and for the earth. When they were shown ads that told them that \u201cbeef that is produced domestically uses high quality feed, advanced standards of care, and a limited carbon footprint,\u201d they were more likely to choose and spend more money on beef.&nbsp;It\u2019s a simple fix that would make it easier for independent and small and mid-size producers to sell their products at a fair price that keeps them in business and rewards them for the high quality of their products.&nbsp;Independent ranchers pay their tax to the checkoff. It\u2019s about time they get their fair share of the benefit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">It\u2019s a simple fix that would make it easier for independent and small and mid-size producers to sell their products at a fair price that keeps them in business and rewards them for the high quality of their products.&nbsp;<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Big corporate beef companies who like how the checkoff currently works in their favor claim that producers overall would be harmed by ads that differentiate distinct qualities of beef \u2014 but our study proves them wrong. When advertising distinguishes that some beef is different, and better, it can grow the general market for beef&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;<\/em>support specialized producers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the checkoff really wanted to, it could easily change the way it operates to treat independent producers fairly \u2014 our study proves it. This would come at no harm to overall demand for beef. Yet the powerful Big Ag interests who control the checkoff won\u2019t make that change, because they don\u2019t want to give up the unfair advantage they\u2019ve gained from decades of generic advertising.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-5\">The beef checkoff tried to discredit FarmSTAND\u2019s research \u2014 and failed spectacularly.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Remember Dr. Kaiser, the man the checkoff pays millions to produce favorable research? They also hired him to try and refute our expert study that showed how simple changes to the checkoff could make the system fairer for independent producers. During the course of our litigation, we&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/ze304wqlnqi747ajm51js\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf?rlkey=okkb11fooz536cdypib1ati1n&amp;st=kbsbucn0&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">showed that Dr. Kaiser is unqualified to comment<\/a>&nbsp;on how the checkoff impacts consumer behavior and that his methods are sloppy and unfit for an expert witness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To start, our research was done by an expert in&nbsp;<em>marketing<\/em>, showing how generic advertising impacts consumer behavior like a person\u2019s willingness to pay for beef. Kaiser\u2019s background is in&nbsp;<em>economics<\/em>, and he admitted in deposition that these fields are different. He readily admitted that he is \u201cnot an expert on marketing studies research\u201d and is \u201cnot aware\u201d of much of the literature that his reports pretended to refute. Indeed, he confessed that he&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/ze304wqlnqi747ajm51js\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf?rlkey=okkb11fooz536cdypib1ati1n&amp;st=31knshio&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">did not even read<\/a>&nbsp;the studies that our expert cited in his report before offering his rebuttal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From this very shaky foundation, Kaiser attempted to discredit our expert report, but ended up just proving how unfit he was to comment on the research. For instance, he tried to skewer part of our expert\u2019s experimental design but couldn\u2019t point to a single journal article to back up his argument. Eventually, he admitted his problem was just based on his \u201cown gut instinct.\u201d Unfortunately for Kaiser and the checkoff, \u201cgut instinct\u201d isn\u2019t a valid academic or legal source.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It gets worse. For the rebuttal report the checkoff paid Kaiser to produce, Kaiser ran a regression to try to disprove our expert. However, he carelessly ran the regression using several variables he later admitted he did not understand. He also made a huge \u201cmistake\u201d and coded survey data wrong in a way that changed the meaning of the data. His report was so sloppy that in his own words, it would not meet the standards to be published in a journal and would \u201cnot [be] accepted in [his] field\u201d of research, let alone in the relevant field of marketing research.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/ze304wqlnqi747ajm51js\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf?rlkey=okkb11fooz536cdypib1ati1n&amp;st=31knshio&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kaiser also admitted in deposition<\/a>&nbsp;that if he had read our expert\u2019s study more carefully, he would not have made these errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kaiser also admitted in deposition&nbsp;that if he had read our expert\u2019s study more carefully, he would not have made these errors.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When the checkoff realized what a hack job their expert had done, they had him do a supplemental report. His supplemental report fares no better under scrutiny, as he still improperly manipulated his variables and miscoded important data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After all of his efforts, the biggest thing Dr. Kaiser proved is that his research is sloppy, full of improper assumptions, and that the beef checkoff is desperate to defend a broken system. Because of our litigation, we were able to peel back the curtain on Kaiser\u2019s shoddy work. Our expert was able to review Kaiser\u2019s research and identify the flaws, and in deposition our attorney could force Kaiser to admit how he made so many fatal errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>If his work in our case was so poor, we must question if he\u2019s applying the same faulty methods in his other work.&nbsp;<\/strong>If he does, it calls into question if there\u2019s any value in the pro-checkoff research so many lawmakers and other decisionmakers have likely seen.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"instead-of-protecting-american-farmers--usda-turns-a-blind-eye-to-fraud-and-abuse\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Instead of Protecting American farmers, USDA Turns a Blind Eye to Fraud and Abuse<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>USDA abandoned its duty to oversee the beef checkoff. Its failure lets fraud and waste fester.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s not just that the beef checkoff, National Cattlemen\u2019s Beef Association (NCBA), and (Qualified State Beef Councils) QSBCs are spending checkoff funds in a way that is unfair even if technically legal. The USDA has created and allowed this system to be so opaque and free of consequences that bad actors get away with flagrantly misusing ranchers\u2019 hard-earned money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2010, accountants reviewing NCBA\u2019s financial records found that tens of thousands of dollars were improperly charged to the checkoff marketing fund or were not adequately documented.&nbsp;Most problematically, the audit found that checkoff money was being used for NCBA lobbying&nbsp;\u2014 a clear violation of the rules that prohibit checkoff funds from being used to influence policy and yet another way the checkoff cuts against independent producers. After all,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dropbox.com\/scl\/fi\/390zyazaqosqx4p2u1ska\/NCBA-Political-and-Lobbying-Activities-and-Materials.pdf?rlkey=ws5uigeepz2230d4errhw1qut&amp;st=zkyx0wzl&amp;dl=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NCBA routinely lobbies for policies that favor mega-meatpackers<\/a>&nbsp;and hurt smaller ranchers, including against mandatory Country of Origin Labeling.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignfull size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"422\" height=\"379\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/luxury-cows.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2462\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/luxury-cows.png 422w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/luxury-cows-300x269.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 422px) 100vw, 422px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-6264e732 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--10);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--10)\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Most problematically, the audit found that checkoff money was being used for NCBA lobbying.<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-center is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The financial review also found that, in violation of federal rules, checkoff money was being spent on travel for the CEO\u2019s family \u2014 including a trip to New Zealand with his wife and a trip to Texas with his wife and daughter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/checkoffreform\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">State QSBCs have also been embroiled in scandal<\/a>&nbsp;for misusing checkoff funds. In 2018, the Ohio Beef Council illegally promoted a fundraiser for a political candidate. This probably shouldn\u2019t be a surprise, since the Ohio Beef Council (the QSBC in charge of properly spending checkoff funds) is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ohiobeef.org\/about-us\/staff-operating-committee\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">one and the same as the Ohio Cattlemen\u2019s Association<\/a>&nbsp;\u2014 a lobbying organization.&nbsp;They call it a \u201ctwo-hat\u201d system; we call it corruption.&nbsp;Despite&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/competitivemarkets.com\/farm-groups-call-for-disqualification-of-ohio-beef-council-from-checkoff-program\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">calls from farm groups<\/a>&nbsp;for USDA to disqualify the Ohio Beef Council, the USDA continues to entrust the Ohio Beef Council with collecting and spending checkoff dollars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It\u2019s not hard to see why many beef producers don\u2019t trust their QSBCs. In 2018, an accountant for the Oklahoma Beef Council was sentenced to federal prison for using the organization as her \u201cpersonal cash cow,\u201d and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.oklahoman.com\/story\/business\/2018\/01\/05\/former-accountant-for-oklahoma-beef-council-sentenced-in-multi-million-dollar-embezzlement-scheme\/60551485007\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">embezzling $2.68 million from the organization<\/a>. Thanks in part to incredibly lax oversight from USDA, she was able to get away with her scheme for eight years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">USDA and the organizations that rake in millions of dollars from the checkoff say ranchers, Congress, and the public should trust the system. Yet time after time, the system proves itself to be unaccountable, opaque, and rife with abuses that cause real harm to tax-paying ranchers who are fighting to survive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-6\">USDA is letting down farmers in all checkoff programs.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The problems with the beef checkoff are not unique.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/checkoffreform\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Examples of abuse<\/a>, lack of transparency, and industry collusion abound when you look into many checkoff programs. Across the board, USDA fails to properly oversee its programs. Meanwhile, small- and mid-size farmers who pay into the programs are left in the lurch. FarmSTAND is proud to work with and represent farmers who are demanding better from USDA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2017, the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on checkoff campaigns that found&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.gao.gov\/assets\/gao-18-54.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">USDA fails to consistently monitor and enforce standards on checkoff programs<\/a>. No surprise, given the abuse we\u2019ve seen play out in the beef checkoff. Specifically, the GAO report found that the USDA was delinquent in reviewing subcontracts used by the programs \u2014 only reviewing one out of eight subcontracts from the sample studied. USDA is supposed to make sure that checkoffs are run according to the rules, but the agency is asleep at the wheel. How can USDA guarantee that funds aren\u2019t being misused if they don\u2019t even look where those funds are being spent?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The GAO report also found that out of the eight advertising programs they reviewed, only four posted all the key documents, including budgets and evaluations of effectiveness, online as required. USDA and the industry groups that run checkoff programs say transparency is important to them, but their actions speak louder than words.&nbsp;Claims of being accountable to taxpayers don\u2019t mean much when checkoffs don\u2019t even share basic accounting about where the money goes and how well it\u2019s used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Claims of being accountable to taxpayers don\u2019t mean much when checkoffs don\u2019t even share basic accounting about where the money goes and how well it\u2019s used.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, the GAO report found that USDA does not have consistent criteria for evaluating how effective checkoff programs are at generating benefits for producers. While checkoff programs tout economic studies that show positive benefits from advertising, GAO notes that USDA lacks a consistent way of reviewing studies. Without a consistent set of standards to measure how effective a program is, these studies that are held up as proof that checkoffs work may actually be misleading. As discussed above, our litigation showed that the beef checkoff\u2019s advertising studies crumble under scrutiny as just another way checkoffs maintain the status quo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Until USDA establishes meaningful oversight to evaluate the effectiveness of checkoff programs, it will be up to the farmers fighting for a fairer system and their advocates to call out waste, misuse, and misleading justification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-7\">The Dairy Checkoff: Overpaid executives, missing reports, and millions to promote big businesses, while dairy farmers suffer.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When you zoom into many of the checkoffs, you\u2019ll find examples of bad behavior and inappropriately-used funds. Take the dairy checkoff. Despite being required to do so, USDA&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/tipsheets\/morning-agriculture\/2017\/09\/14\/dairy-checkoff-reports-mia-at-usda-222287\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">failed to file annual financial reports<\/a>&nbsp;to Congress to show how funds were being used \u2014 for four years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1430\" height=\"832\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/big4-edited-2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3140\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/big4-edited-2.png 1430w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/big4-edited-2-300x175.png 300w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/big4-edited-2-1024x596.png 1024w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/big4-edited-2-768x447.png 768w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/big4-edited-2-18x10.png 18w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1430px) 100vw, 1430px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Executives aren\u2019t the only ones making bank from the dairy checkoff. The top five&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/projects.propublica.org\/nonprofits\/organizations\/363992031\/201933199349315253\/full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">highest-paid contractors<\/a>&nbsp;each year are a who\u2019s who of America\u2019s biggest corporations. In one year, the dairy checkoff awarded $9 million to Domino\u2019s, $8 million to Fairlife (distributed by Coca-Cola), $5 million to the NFL, and $5 million to McDonalds. Small dairy farmers are right to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/2023\/10\/26\/dairy-farmers-shouldnt-be-forced-to-fund-dominos-marketing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">question why they are paying for Domino\u2019s marketing<\/a>&nbsp;when they\u2019re struggling to make ends meet on the farm. Dairy is another glaring example of a checkoff taking money from small producers only to line the pockets of the powerful corporations who control and exploit our food system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-8\">Checkoffs fund biased research that props up agribusiness as usual.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Big Ag has a problem that old school \u201cbuy more beef\u201d advertising can\u2019t fix: People know that it\u2019s wrecking our planet. Scientific study after scientific study has shed light on the major role industrial animal agriculture plays in the climate crisis. More and more, people are choosing to eat less meat and dairy out of environmental consciousness. Facing this new image problem (born of overwhelming evidence that industrial meat production emits massive amounts of greenhouse gases), checkoffs and industry groups have invested heavily in a new tactic to distract and deny responsibility: funding industry-friendly research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By funding research at universities, checkoffs and the companies that control them can shape the narrative around food and the harms of industrial animal agriculture. At land grant universities across the country, that in turn supports dangerous and misleading claims from the industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By funding research at universities, checkoffs and the companies that control them can shape the narrative around food and the harms of industrial animal agriculture.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Specifically, industry-supported research has produced widely touted studies that purportedly show that meat and dairy have no impact on the climate. Checkoffs also fund sophisticated online monitoring systems, like the one run by NCBA, that keep track of public online discussions about sustainability so that industry PR can quickly intervene and boost industry-funded research that makes Big Ag look climate-friendly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Favorable research is now a critical part of the playbook for an industry facing increasing public scrutiny. The pork checkoff in particular is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/investigatemidwest.org\/2023\/09\/21\/the-national-pork-board-gives-more-grant-money-than-any-other-checkoff-critics-say-it-favors-big-pork\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">spending big on research grants<\/a>, even as small farmers point out that this kind of research does nothing to help them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Big Pork knows it has a reputation problem, in no small part due to the industry\u2019s aggressive opposition to animal welfare improvements like California\u2019s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/proposition-12\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Proposition 12<\/a>. Their solution? An $8.5 million checkoff-funded program they\u2019re calling the \u201cReal Pork Trust Consortium,\u201d where students can earn a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sentientmedia.org\/pork-industry-influence-academia\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PhD in building public trust in the pork industry<\/a>. It sounds like a joke, but the truth is that the pork checkoff would rather spend $8.5 million of tax money from pork farmers to train PR reps instead of helping farmers raise hogs in better conditions. Evidently, even the pork checkoff realized the initiative was a waste of millions of dollars \u2014 FOIA documents revealed that only two years into the five year program,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sentientmedia.org\/pork-industry-pulls-academic-partnership\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Pork Board decided to \u201csunset\u201d the program in 2025<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"the-fight-for-reform\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">The Fight for Reform<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For decades, the farmers forced to pay checkoff taxes have fought for a fairer system. From pork producers campaigning to eliminate the pork checkoff to state-wide efforts to defeat new checkoffs, coalitions of independent producers say no more to unaccountable, unfair spending of their tax dollars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-9\">Pork producers voted to end the pork checkoff. USDA didn\u2019t let them.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The pork checkoff was started in 1985. According to Austin Frerick\u2019s book&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.austinfrerick.com\/barons\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Barons<\/em><\/a>, during the first twelve years of the pork checkoff, almost 250,000 family farms left the hog business. By the late 1990s, pork producers were fed up with the checkoff. For years they watched as the program that was meant to support their livelihoods actually used their tax dollars to tip the scales further for the huge corporations driving them out of business. Farmers organized a massive signature campaign that triggered a referendum to eliminate the checkoff.&nbsp;The checkoff spent millions to try to defeat the effort, but they were unable to stifle farmers\u2019 voices. In 2000,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/archive\/politics\/2001\/01\/16\/hog-producers-defeat-pork-checkoff\/b56f869d-9fae-459f-b3ba-d28c7c006065\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the majority of farmers voted to end the checkoff<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The checkoff spent millions to try to defeat the effort, but they were unable to stifle farmers\u2019 voices. In 2000,&nbsp;the majority of farmers voted to end the checkoff.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Unfortunately, this democratic decision was shut down by USDA: The USDA secretary&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.farmanddairy.com\/news\/court-pork-checkoff-will-continue\/2493.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reinstated the pork checkoff in a settlement with pork industry groups<\/a>, essentially throwing out the vote. When the courts ordered USDA to ask farmers if they wanted another referendum, USDA said not enough farmers voted for a new referendum \u2014 without ever releasing the vote count. It\u2019s no wonder USDA\u2019s heavy-handed decisionmaking and ensuing secrecy has bred distrust from taxpaying farmers. Despite this setback, pork farmers are still advocating against the checkoff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-10\">Farmers fight back and win against new checkoff programs.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The checkoff system gets even more complicated \u2014 and burdensome for farmers \u2014 in states where there is an additional state checkoff tax collected on top of the national checkoff. When Missouri put a new state beef checkoff up for a referendum, grassroots groups like the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/morural.org\/2016\/01\/25\/stop-the-beef-checkoff\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Missouri Rural Crisis Center mobilized producers<\/a>&nbsp;to vote no.&nbsp;Their message was clear \u2014&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/morural.org\/2016\/04\/25\/missouricattlewin\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">75% of voters rejected the new tax<\/a>&nbsp;and said no to further enriching the industry-controlled checkoff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Their message was clear \u2014&nbsp;75% of voters rejected the new tax&nbsp;and said no to further enriching the industry-controlled checkoff.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A similar story played out in Oklahoma, where beef producers resoundingly&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.feedstuffs.com\/livestock-and-poultry-market-news\/oklahoma-beef-producers-vote-down-checkoff-increase\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rejected an additional $1 state checkoff<\/a>&nbsp;on top of the $1 federal checkoff. And when a new proposal for a national organic products checkoff appeared in the 2014 farm bill to the surprise of many organic farmers, a coalition of farmers, consumer advocates, and watchdog groups organized to make sure the USDA heard that&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/thecounter.org\/organic-checkoff-civil-war\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">farmers did not want an organics checkoff<\/a>, ultimately pressuring USDA to terminate the proposed program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These victories against new checkoffs show that for farmers across the country, enough is enough. Independent producers are tired of seeing their tax dollars spent promoting the huge corporations that threaten their livelihoods and their ability to farm animals in fairer, healthier ways.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color has-heading-font-family wp-elements-11\">The OFF Act would make common sense reforms to checkoffs to increase transparency and accountability.<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">People from across the political spectrum can clearly see that checkoff programs, as they function now, are not fair. That\u2019s why there\u2019s a bipartisan bill in Congress to reform the checkoff system so that it can start doing what it\u2019s supposed to do \u2014 support farmers.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.booker.senate.gov\/news\/press\/booker-lee-introduce-off-act-to-protect-farmers-cut-government-waste\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The OFF act<\/a>, introduced by Senators Cory Booker and Mike Lee, would prohibit checkoffs from contracting with lobbying organizations like the National Cattlemen\u2019s Beef Association and the National Pork Producers Council.&nbsp;This critical change would mean checkoff money could no longer prop up political lobbying that enriches powerful interests and threatens the livelihoods of America\u2019s farmers. The OFF act would also increase transparency from the checkoffs by requiring programs to publish more budget and expenditure information and mandating periodic audits of the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40);padding-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This critical change would mean checkoff money could no longer prop up political lobbying that enriches powerful interests and threatens the livelihoods of America\u2019s farmers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Passing the OFF act is a critical step towards transforming the checkoff system. If we can cut industry lobbying groups off from the millions of dollars of checkoff funds they\u2019ve taken for granted, we can make sure they aren\u2019t using independent farmers\u2019 money against them. More transparency about how and where the money is spent will also empower farmers to evaluate how their money is being spent and to raise alarms when it is being misused.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-54ee1653 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\" style=\"padding-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--40)\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:33.33%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-12\">Further reading on checkoffs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-container-core-column-is-layout-c3631a8a wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:66.66%\">\n<p class=\"has-body-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\">Farm and food advocates across the country are fighting to overhaul the checkoff system. Our friends at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/checkoffreform\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Farm Action<\/a>&nbsp;are key leaders on this issue. For further reading, check out Farm Action\u2019s resources on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/2023\/04\/12\/checkoff-corruption\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">checkoff corruption<\/a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/farmaction.us\/checkoffreform\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">checkoff reform<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500;--columnList:1\" class=\"wp-block-list has-body-small-font-size\">\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Checkoff-study-summary.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2497\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Checkoff Study Summary<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Dimofte-Expert-Report.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2458\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dimofte Expert Report<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/FarmSTAND-Proposition-12-Amicus-Brief.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2496\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FarmSTAND Proposition 12 Amicus Brief<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Kaiser-Deposition.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2457\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kaiser Deposition<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/NCBA-Pay-to-Play-Investment-Schedule.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2495\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NCBA Pay to Play Investment Schedule<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/NCBA-Political-and-Lobbying-Activities-and-Materials.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2494\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NCBA Political and Lobbying Activities and Materials<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Sweat-Deposition-Excerpt.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2493\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sweat Deposition Excerpt<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li class=\"has-body-small-font-size\" style=\"font-style:normal;font-weight:500\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Wright-Deposition-Excerpt.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2492\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wright Deposition Excerpt<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Farmers and ranchers have beef with the checkoff, the system responsible for slogans like \u201cBeef. It\u2019s what\u2019s for dinner,\u201d \u201cThe Incredible, Edible Egg,\u201d and &#8220;Got Milk?&#8221; Food checkoff programs penalize independent producers of food by funneling money to the lobbying and trade organizations that boost the largest corporate producers, according to research featured in this edition of FarmSTAND\u2019s Deep Dive series.<\/p>\n<p>In the course of our litigation to reform the checkoff system on behalf of independent ranchers, we commissioned groundbreaking research that shows it\u2019s possible to have a checkoff that\u2019s fair for all farmers.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":3135,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"issue":[21],"class_list":["post-1746","deep_dive","type-deep_dive","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","issue-farmers-rural-communities"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Deep Dive: Checkoff - Farmstand<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"We\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a fair food system led by independent food producers\u2014including by taking on USDA\u2019s checkoff programs.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/analisis-profundo\/deep-dive-checkoff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Deep Dive: Checkoff - Farmstand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"We\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a fair food system led by independent food producers\u2014including by taking on USDA\u2019s checkoff programs.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/analisis-profundo\/deep-dive-checkoff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Farmstand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-17T15:28:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1476\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"946\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"33 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/\",\"name\":\"Deep Dive: Checkoff - Farmstand\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-15T08:56:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-17T15:28:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"We\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a fair food system led by independent food producers\u2014including by taking on USDA\u2019s checkoff programs.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg\",\"width\":1476,\"height\":946},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/deep-dive-checkoff\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Deep Dives\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/deep-dive\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Deep Dive: Checkoff\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Farmstand\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Farmstand\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/farmstand-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/farmstand-logo.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":103,\"caption\":\"Farmstand\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/farmstand.bsky.social\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Deep Dive: Checkoff - Farmstand","description":"We\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a fair food system led by independent food producers\u2014including by taking on USDA\u2019s checkoff programs.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/analisis-profundo\/deep-dive-checkoff\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Deep Dive: Checkoff - Farmstand","og_description":"We\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a fair food system led by independent food producers\u2014including by taking on USDA\u2019s checkoff programs.","og_url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/analisis-profundo\/deep-dive-checkoff\/","og_site_name":"Farmstand","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/","article_modified_time":"2026-09-17T15:28:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1476,"height":946,"url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"33 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/","name":"Deep Dive: Checkoff - Farmstand","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg","datePublished":"2025-09-15T08:56:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-17T15:28:00+00:00","description":"We\u2019re fighting in courtrooms and communities to dismantle the barriers to a fair food system led by independent food producers\u2014including by taking on USDA\u2019s checkoff programs.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-ES","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-ES","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/FS_DeepDives_Checkoff_Tbnail@2x.jpg","width":1476,"height":946},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/deep-dive-checkoff\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Deep Dives","item":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/deep-dive\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Deep Dive: Checkoff"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/","name":"Puesto de granja","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es-ES"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization","name":"Puesto de granja","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-ES","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/farmstand-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/farmstand-logo.svg","width":150,"height":103,"caption":"Farmstand"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/farmstand.bsky.social"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deep_dive\/1746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deep_dive"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/deep_dive"}],"version-history":[{"count":66,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deep_dive\/1746\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3246,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/deep_dive\/1746\/revisions\/3246"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue?post=1746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}