{"id":1719,"date":"2021-10-27T16:53:41","date_gmt":"2021-10-27T16:53:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/farmstand.chee.studio\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/"},"modified":"2026-09-14T07:30:12","modified_gmt":"2026-09-14T07:30:12","slug":"ag-gag-litigation","status":"publish","type":"case","link":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Ag-Gag Litigation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Widely shared information about how our food is raised helps us hold corporations and government accountable. For example, investigations into animal treatment on factory farms have led to major policy reforms for animal handling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, since the 1990s, Big Ag has campaigned to pass \u201cAg-Gag\u201d laws in states across the country \u2013 laws that penalize whistleblowers for exposing the worker, environmental, and animal abuse that happens behind the closed doors of factory farms and slaughterhouses. There\u2019s a reason that the agriculture industry expends immense time and resources to pass Ag-Gag laws: to escape accountability. If the public and consumers knew the truth behind&nbsp;meat&nbsp;in the grocery store aisles, they would not stand for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND (formerly the Food Project at Public Justice) engages in litigation to strike down these unconstitutional and pernicious Ag-Gag laws that stand in the way of a just food system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Click on the drop-down menu below to learn the basics behind each Ag-Gag law and what we\u2019re doing to strike it down.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion farmstand-accordion collapse\" data-expand-first=\"collapse\"><div>\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"arkansas\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Arkansas<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND (formerly the Food Project at Public Justice) is lead counsel on behalf of the <a href=\"https:\/\/aldf.org\/\">Animal Legal Defense Fund<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/animalequality.org\/\">Animal Equality<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.biologicaldiversity.org\/\">Center for Biological Diversity<\/a>, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/foodchainworkers.org\/\">Food Chain Workers Alliance<\/a>&nbsp;in this case to overturn Arkansas\u2019 Ag-Gag statute. This statute is modeled after North Carolina\u2019s, but with a few tweaks to try to protect it from being overturned as unconstitutional.&nbsp;<strong>Enacted in 2017,&nbsp;the law aims to silence speech by advocacy groups wishing to conduct undercover investigations of agricultural facilities&nbsp;and other&nbsp;private&nbsp;businesses across the state, including nursing homes and daycare centers.<\/strong> It allows an employer to seek damages against any person who \u201cexceeds the[ir] authority\u201d in a \u201cnonpublic area\u201d of \u201ccommercial property.\u201d The statute exclusively provides for a civil remedy and prohibits the state from enforcing that remedy to protect any of its property \u2013 a detail that legislators insisted would protect the statute from challenge because it did not authorize state action.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a first-of-its-kind ruling, the Eighth Circuit held&nbsp;groups who wished to engage in undercover investigations&nbsp;could preemptively seek to stop&nbsp;private&nbsp;companies from using the law against them, concluding that the power the state granted those companies inhibits speech. The case has been&nbsp;remanded&nbsp;to the&nbsp;District&nbsp;Court&nbsp;for the litigation to proceed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more resources at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/arkansas-ag-gag\/\">Arkansas Ag-Gag Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Vaught<\/em>, 8 F.4th 714 (8th Cir. 2021)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-1\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Complaint-AR.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2684\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complaint (AR)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-2\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opening-Brief-on-Appeal-AR.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2683\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opening Brief on Appeal (AR)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opinion-AR.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2682\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opinion (AR)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"idaho\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Idaho<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Working with a coalition of groups including the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/aldf.org\/\">Animal Legal Defense Fund<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.peta.org\/\">People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals<\/a>, the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.acluidaho.org\/\">American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho<\/a>, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.centerforfoodsafety.org\/\">Center for Food Safety<\/a>, we helped secure the very first court decision&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.thinkprogress.org\/federal-judge-rules-idaho-ag-gag-law-unconstitutional-95b5bfe9afb9\/\">declaring an Ag Gag law unconstitutional<\/a>. <strong>Idaho\u2019s statute made it a crime for employees to go undercover at a factory farm and report violations taking place at those facilities.<\/strong> The District Court agreed with our argument that the state\u2019s law blatantly violated the First Amendment. After the State appealed our victory, we helped defend the decision before the Ninth Circuit, which held that it is unconstitutional to criminalize recording at an agricultural facility and to criminalize false speech used to gain access to such a facility to report on what is going on there. However, the Ninth Circuit upheld a provision that made it a crime to obtain employment at an agricultural facility by misrepresentation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more resources at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/idaho-ag-gag\/\">Idaho Ag-Gag Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.idd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Trial Case No.&nbsp;1:14-CV-00104-BLW<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca9.uscourts.gov\/\">Appellate Case No.&nbsp;15-35960&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Otter<\/em>, 118 F. Supp. 3d 1195 (D. Idaho 2015),&nbsp;<em>aff\u2019d in part, rev\u2019d in part sub nom.&nbsp;Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Wasden<\/em>, 878 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 2018)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-3\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opposition-to-Motion-to-Dismiss-ID.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2690\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (ID)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Order-Denying-Motion-to-Dismiss-ID.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2689\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order Denying Motion to Dismiss (ID)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Motion-for-Partial-Summary-Judgment-ID.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ID)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-4\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Plaintiffs-Appellees-Answering-Brief-ID.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2687\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Plaintiffs-Appellees\u2019 Answering Brief (ID)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opinion-ID.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2686\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opinion (ID)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"iowa\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Iowa<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-5\">Iowa I<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>FarmSTAND (formerly the Food Project at Public Justice) serves as co-counsel in a challenge to Iowa\u2019s first Ag-Gag law, which criminalizes undercover investigations at factory farms and slaughterhouses.<\/strong> This statute made it a crime to gain access to or employment at such a facility under false pretenses. <strong>The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa struck down the law as violating the First Amendment.<\/strong> The court held that the law penalizes and thereby chills First Amendment-protected activities based on the content of speech, and because it is not tailored to serve the State\u2019s asserted interests. The State of Iowa appealed to the Eighth Circuit, which held the law\u2019s prohibition on making misrepresentations to obtain a job \u2014 as long as those misrepresentations don\u2019t include one\u2019s qualifications for the job \u2014 was unconstitutional. The law\u2019s prohibition on making misrepresentations to obtain access to an agricultural facility was remanded to District Court to determine if the law is viewpoint discriminatory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more resources at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/iowa-ag-gag-i-aldf-et-al-v-reynolds-et-al\/\">Iowa Ag-Gag I Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.iasd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Trial Case No. 1:16-cv-25<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov\/\">Appellate Case&nbsp;No. 20-1776&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Reynolds<\/em>, 353 F. Supp. 3d 812 (S.D. Iowa 2019),&nbsp;<em>aff\u2019d in part, rev\u2019d in part and remanded<\/em>, 8 F.4th 781 (8th Cir. 2021)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-6\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Complaint-Iowa-I.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2694\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complaint (Iowa I)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-7\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opinion-Iowa-I.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2693\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opinion (Iowa I)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Iowa II<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two months after we successfully struck down Iowa\u2019s first Ag-Gag law, Iowa\u2019s legislature made a second attempt to prevent journalists from exposing the truth of industrial animal agriculture. <strong>We then successfully struck down the second Ag-Gag law as well, defending transparency in the food system.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>As with the previous law, this version criminalizes undercover investigations at factory farms and slaughterhouses<\/strong><strong>,<\/strong> <strong>but it targets a slightly different form of speech that is integral to those investigations.<\/strong> The revised Ag-Gag law criminalizes using \u201cdeception\u201d to gain access to or employment at an agricultural production facility \u201c<em>with the intent to cause physical or economic harm or other injury&nbsp;<\/em>to the agricultural production facility,\u201d&nbsp;such as by exposing unethical conduct that leads to boycotts.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Serving as co-counsel in this case, we argued that this law penalized and thereby chilled First Amendment-protected activities based on the content of speech and was therefore unconstitutional. <strong>The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa sided with our clients, <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/court-strikes-down-second-iowa-ag-gag-law\/\">and held that Iowa\u2019s second Ag-Gag law violates the First Amendment.<\/a> In January, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court, reviving the law.<\/strong> The Eighth Circuit\u2019s ruling stated its outcome conflicts with holdings by the 7th and 10th Circuits on similar Ag-Gag laws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more resources at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/iowa-ag-gag-ii-aldf-v-reynolds\/\">Iowa Ag-Gag II Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.iasd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Trial Case No.&nbsp;4:19-cv-00124<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Reynolds<\/em>, No. 4:19-cv-00124-JEG-HCA, 2019 WL 8301668 (S.D. Iowa Dec. 2, 2019)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-8\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Complaint-Iowa-II.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complaint (Iowa II)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-Iowa-II.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2700\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Iowa II)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Iowa-II.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2699\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motion for Summary Judgment (Iowa II)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-9\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opinion-Iowa-II.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2698\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opinion (Iowa II)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-10\">Iowa III<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND (formerly the Food Project at Public Justice) serves as lead counsel in this case challenging&nbsp;another&nbsp;iteration of Iowa\u2019s Ag\u2013Gag law, which was passed shortly after a preliminary injunction issued against the law in Iowa II. <strong>This time the law created a new crime if a person trespasses and makes a recording<\/strong> <strong>on&nbsp;the trespassed-upon property, thereby limiting&nbsp;investigators\u2019 and activists\u2019 ability to communicate with the public.&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In October 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/court-strikes-down-iowa-recording-ban-ag-gag-law\/\">ruled that Iowa\u2019s third Ag-Gag law is unconstitutional<\/a>, holding that the law facially violates the First Amendment. In January 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the District Court, but sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings.<\/strong> The Eighth Circuit held the law facially constitutional because there could be circumstances in which it lawfully applied, but acknowledged that there might be recordings that did not cause additional harms to property and a prohibition on those recording would be unconstitutional. Thus, the Eighth Circuit authorized the plaintiffs to continue to argue that the law could not be applied to them, even if might be applied to others. It sent the case back to the trial court to continue this fight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On remand, the trial court granted Iowa\u2019s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Plaintiffs appealed this recent trial court decision. The Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision in April 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.iasd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Trial Case No. 4:21-cv-00231<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement v. Reynolds<\/em>, 4:21-cv-00231 (S.D. Iowa)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-11\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Complaint-Iowa-III.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2707\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complaint (Iowa III)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Order-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-Iowa-III.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2706\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order Motion for Summary Judgment (Iowa III)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Order-Motion-to-Dismiss-Iowa-III.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2704\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order Motion to Dismiss (Iowa III)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-12\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2022-Opinion-Iowa-III-1.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2708\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2022 Opinion (Iowa III)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2026-Opinion-Iowa-III.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2709\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2026 Opinion (Iowa III)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"kansas\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Kansas<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Kansas passed the first Ag-Gag law in the nation, which made it a crime to lie to an agricultural facility or make recordings of an agricultural facility if that speech resulted in boycotts or other public pressure against the facility.<\/strong> Serving as co-counsel to a coalition of non-profit organizations, FarmSTAND helped strike down the law in the District Court. We then helped defend the law on appeal.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/appeals-court-affirms-kansas-ag-gag-law-is-unconstitutional%e2%80%a8\/\"><strong>The Tenth Circuit affirmed a lower court\u2019s ruling that found the law unconstitutional<\/strong><\/a>, granting our clients a permanent injunction and barring the state from enforcing the Ag-Gag law. The court held that Kansas may not legislate speech in order to silence views critical of animal agriculture. The Supreme Court declined to review the Tenth Circuit\u2019s decision, thus securing the victory for workers, animals, and transparency in the food system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ksd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/ShowIndex.pl\">Trial Case No.&nbsp;2:18-cv-02657<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca10.uscourts.gov\/\">Appellate Case No.&nbsp;20-3082<\/a>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Kelly<\/em>, 434 F. Supp. 3d 974 (D. Kan. 2020),&nbsp;<em>amended<\/em>,&nbsp;No. CV 18-2657-KHV, 2020 WL 1659855 (D. Kan. Apr. 3, 2020), and&nbsp;<em>aff\u2019d<\/em>,&nbsp;9 F.4th 1219 (10th Cir. 2021), and&nbsp;<em>aff\u2019d<\/em>,&nbsp;9 F.4th 1219 (10th Cir. 2021)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-13\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Complaint-KS.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2716\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complaint (KS)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Order-Motions-for-Summary-Judgment-KS.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2715\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order Motions for Summary Judgment (KS)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-14\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Appellees-Brief-KS.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2714\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Appellees\u2019 Brief (KS)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opinion-KS.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2713\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opinion (KS)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"north-carolina-\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">North Carolina <\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">FarmSTAND is lead counsel on behalf of a coalition of public interest groups in a constitutional challenge to North Carolina\u2019s \u201cAnti-Sunshine\u201d law\u2014a statute that, like Ag-Gag laws, allows employers and property owners to sue undercover investigators who wish to blow the whistle on unethical or illegal activities in the workplace. In a win for transparency in the food system, the coalition was successful in striking down the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the law, organizations and journalists who conduct undercover investigations, and individuals who expose improper or criminal conduct by North Carolina employers,&nbsp;are susceptible to suit and substantial damages if they make such evidence available to the public or the press. The law\u2019s text and legislative history confirm that the statute\u2019s primary objective is to stop undercover investigations by what the legislature termed \u201cprivate special interest organizations,\u201d particularly those focused on animal agriculture and food, health, and safety. However, the statute extends beyond animal agriculture and could also penalize undercover investigations in settings like daycare centers and nursing homes.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. District Court for the Middle District Of North Carolina struck down two of the law\u2019s provisions \u2014 those that prevented gathering and release of recordings of illegal and unethical activities at the workplace. The court also protected undercover investigations of animal facilities and factory farms from two other provisions that would have prevented gathering information in other ways.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After a federal judge for the Middle District of North Carolina struck down the law, the state appealed the decision to the Fourth Circuit. <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/fourth-circuit-enjoins-north-carolina-ag-gag-law-affirming-constitutionality-of-undercover-investigations-and-whistleblowing\/\">The Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of our clients, affirming their undercover investigations and whistleblowing are protected by the Constitution.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiffs group consists of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.peta.org\/\">People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/aldf.org\/\">Animal Legal Defense Fund<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.centerforfoodsafety.org\/\">Center for Food Safety<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foodandwaterwatch.org\/\">Food &amp; Water Watch<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/whistleblower.org\/\">Government Accountability Project<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.farmsanctuary.org\/\">Farm Sanctuary<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/\">Farm Forward<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aspca.org\/\">American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals<\/a>. The <em>New York Times<\/em>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/02\/01\/opinion\/no-more-exposes-in-north-carolina.html\">published an editorial endorsing<\/a>&nbsp;the challenge.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more resources at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/peta-et-al-v-cooper-et-al\/\">North Carolina Ag-Gag Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ncmd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Trial Case No. 1:16-cv-25<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca4.uscourts.gov\/\">Appellate Case&nbsp;No. 20-1776&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>PETA v. Stein<\/em>, 737 F. App\u2019x 122 (4th Cir. 2018) (determining Plaintiffs successfully alleged standing)<br><em>PETA v. Stein<\/em>, 466 F. Supp. 3d 547 (M.D.N.C. 2020)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-15\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Complaint-NC.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2722\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Complaint (NC)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-NC.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2721\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motion for Summary Judgment (NC)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Memorandum-Opinion-and-Order-NC.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2720\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Memorandum Opinion and Order (NC)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-16\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opening-and-Response-Brief-on-Appeal-NC.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2719\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opening and Response Brief on Appeal (NC)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ca4.uscourts.gov\/OAarchive\/mp3\/20-1776-20211027.mp3\">Oral Arguments<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opposition-to-Petitions-for-Writs-of-Certiorari-SCOTUS.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2718\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Opposition to Petitions for Writs of Certiorari (NC)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"utah\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Utah<\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We submitted amicus briefs in a constitutional challenge to a Utah statute that criminalizes whistleblowing activity in the farmed animal agricultural industry\u00a0\u2014\u00a0in particular, slaughterhouses, meat processing plants, and factory farms. <strong>The law at issue makes it a crime to \u201cobtain access to an agricultural operation under false pretenses\u201d or \u201cinterfere\u201d with any agricultural operation or facility by virtue of taking photographs or recordings of the operation without the owner\u2019s consent.<\/strong> The district court resolved the case in our favor, striking down the law in its entirety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more information at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/utah-ag-gag-animal-legal-defense-fund-v-herbert\/\">Utah Ag-Gag Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.utd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Case No. 2:13-cv-00679-RJS<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Herbert<\/em>, 263 F. Supp. 3d 1193 (D. Utah 2017)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-17\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Amicus-brief-UT.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2724\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Amicus brief (UT)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-accordion-entry farmstand-accordion-entry\" data-faq=\"wyoming-\"><h3 class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header-wrapper has-body-font-size\"><button class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__header\" aria-expanded=\"false\"><span class=\"accordion-title\">Wyoming <\/span><span class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__trigger\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/button><\/h3><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><div class=\"farmstand-accordion-entry__content--inner\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Leading a coalition of groups including the\u00a0Western Watersheds Project, the National Press Photographers Association, and the Natural Resources Defense Council,\u00a0we obtained the first appellate decision applying the First Amendment against Ag-Gag laws. <strong>Wyoming made it a crime and imposed civil penalties if a person trespassed on the way to get environmental data, such as that used to advocate for environmental regulations for agricultural pollution.<\/strong> The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held this restriction on\u00a0gathering\u00a0data was unconstitutional \u2013 it\u00a0regulated speech\u00a0because it prevented recording information and developing political arguments. We then litigated the case on remand to the\u00a0District\u00a0Court, which held the restriction failed First Amendment scrutiny, striking down the provision.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Find more resources at the <a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/western-watershed-project-et-al-v-peter-michael\/\"><em>Western Watersheds Project v. Peter Michael<\/em> Case Page<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.wyd.uscourts.gov\/cgi-bin\/login.pl\">Trial Case No. 15-CV-169-SWS<\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/ecf.ca10.uscourts.gov\/\">Appellate Case No.&nbsp;16-8083&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Western Watersheds Project v. Michael<\/em>, 869 F.3d 1189 (10th Cir. 2017)<br><em>Western Watersheds Project v. Michael<\/em>, 353 F. Supp. 3d 1176 (D. Wyo. 2018)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-farmstand-case-resources farmstand-case-resources\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-18\">Trial Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-WY.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2727\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motion for Summary Judgment (WY)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Order-on-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-WY.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2726\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Order on Motion for Summary Judgment (WY)<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns post-inline-highlight open is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-a3abbf02 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:20%\">\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-dark-blue-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-19\">Appellate Briefs<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Opening-Brief-on-Appeal-WY.pdf\" data-type=\"attachment\" data-id=\"2728\">Opening Brief on Appeal (WY)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Appellate Opinion (WY)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ag-Gag laws, which are pushed by lobbyists for corporate agriculture companies, are an attempt to escape scrutiny over unsafe practices, environmental pollution, and worker and animal abuses. And they keep getting more dangerous: the latest crop of Ag-Gag laws passed in Iowa, Arkansas and North Carolina penalize whistleblowers in many industries beyond agriculture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Workers at slaughterhouses, who are predominantly people of color and often undocumented, endure unsafe working conditions that can result in amputations, musculoskeletal injuries, and even death. Rural and environmental justice communities see excess manure from factory farms polluting their air and water. Animals in factory farms live dark, short lives cooped up in cages. <strong>Whistleblowers and union organizers must be allowed to expose these human rights and animal abuses for the benefit of consumers, workers, and rural communities alike.&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>But&nbsp;Ag-Gag laws threaten liability for those who record or publish evidence of these improper and often illegal practices, amounting to an attack on our constitutional&nbsp;right to free speech.<\/strong> Those who expose unsafe and abusive practices should not face penalties while the true culprits escape accountability.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"512\" src=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2730\" srcset=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png 1024w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-768x384.png 768w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1536x768.png 1536w, https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag.png 2040w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down the Ag-Gag laws that penalize whistleblowers who expose the truth about the factory farm system.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"issue":[18,19],"class_list":["post-1719","case","type-case","status-publish","hentry","issue-animal-welfare","issue-consumer-rights"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ag-Gag Litigation - Farmstand<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.|A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/caso\/ag-gag-litigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ag-Gag Litigation - Farmstand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.|A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/caso\/ag-gag-litigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Farmstand\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-14T07:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ag-Gag Litigation - Farmstand\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/10\\\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-27T16:53:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-14T07:30:12+00:00\",\"description\":\"A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.|A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/10\\\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/10\\\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/ag-gag-litigation\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cases\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/case\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ag-Gag Litigation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Farmstand\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Farmstand\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-ES\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/farmstand-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/farmstand-logo.svg\",\"width\":150,\"height\":103,\"caption\":\"Farmstand\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/farmstand.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/farmstandorg\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/bsky.app\\\/profile\\\/farmstand.bsky.social\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ag-Gag Litigation - Farmstand","description":"A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.|A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/caso\/ag-gag-litigation\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ag-Gag Litigation - Farmstand","og_description":"A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.|A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.","og_url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/caso\/ag-gag-litigation\/","og_site_name":"Farmstand","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/","article_modified_time":"2026-09-14T07:30:12+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/","name":"Ag-Gag Litigation - Farmstand","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png","datePublished":"2021-10-27T16:53:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-14T07:30:12+00:00","description":"A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.|A just, healthy, and thriving food system requires transparency. Public Justice engages in litigation to strike down\u00a0unconstitutional Ag-Gag laws\u00a0that stand in the way of a just food system.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-ES","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-ES","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Ag-Gag-1024x512.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/ag-gag-litigation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cases","item":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/case\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ag-Gag Litigation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/","name":"Puesto de granja","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es-ES"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#organization","name":"Puesto de granja","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-ES","@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/farmstand-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/farmstand-logo.svg","width":150,"height":103,"caption":"Farmstand"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/farmstand.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/farmstandorg\/","https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/farmstand.bsky.social"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/1719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/case"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/1719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2731,"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/case\/1719\/revisions\/2731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"issue","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/farmstand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue?post=1719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}